data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a63d1/a63d1a73ac58c305c43b5a981b92661d4006644e" alt=""
By positing three challenges that
should direct reflection on missiological prospects for the twenty first
century, Javier proceeds to discuss missiology in the context of post modernity
seating side by side with globalization. Concrete situations were presented so
as to elucidate the readers to where and how missionaries should live. Javier’s
employment of Claude Geffre’s four acts in which the writing of the
possibilities and promises of history can be possible, established a solid
foundation for the establishment of a more humane human society, where respect
for one’s self, for other and to the Earth exist. With that, Javier continues his
discussion with the re-imaging of the missionary in the new world. It presents
the missionaries in the Asian context, being the locus and milieu of mission
inter gentes. It is where they are expected to be bridge-builders towards the
other religious and culture. They ought to be healers of people memory, home
builders and man of silence.
Javier’s discussion could have been
better if a considerable part of the article was dedicated to the theology of
harmony instead of the economic and philosophical underpinnings of the present
missiology. The harmonization between the Catholic Christian teachings, which
is primarily western in orientation, with the Eastern and other pertinent
cultures can elucidate further the challenges confronting the contemporary mission
of the Church. Theological and historical inputs can be of great help in this
aspect of missiology. By understanding first the history of the Asia in
connection with the past missionaries from the west, the way the West presented
themselves and their cultures to the East, we can best charter the future of
mission in Asia, which is comprise of various culture and traditions.
No comments:
Post a Comment