Sunday, September 29, 2013

DEDICATION

Deciding to dedicate one’s self for an appropriate interest is quite difficult, yet fruitful in the end. But many people did not struggle to endure such difficulty. At the end of their lives, they succeed in no definite field of this world. Worst is, their relationship with other people was also affected. This is very true to many people in other countries, especially developed countries wherein most of the people prioritize their work than their family. Giving more priority to work often lead them to unhappy life. 



In their novel, ‘The Rule of Four’, Ian Caldwell and Dustin Thomason truly illustrated the importance of being decided, as early as possible, on being committed in a particular matter, and to remain loyal to such commitment. Tom, the fictitious leading character created by these two creative and clever authors for their novel, give us an idea about a typical American college student, a confuse yet eager person. He was torn between two of his interest, namely to Katie, his girlfriend, and to Hypnerotomachia, a medieval mysterious text fastened with puzzles which is his father’s frustration to solve, but unfortunately his father wasn't able to inked the solution to the Hypnerotomachia because of a car accident. At the end of the story, Tom chose the appropriate interest for him, he chose Katie. He chose her than the ancient puzzle, the article in his life that had made him miserable in the darkness of a secluded library, instead of a world where his friends, together with him, enjoins the blessing of the Creator.    

Have we ever asked ourselves what do we really prioritize in life? Have we dedicated our total attention to the matter we ought to prioritize? Or are we trying to sail to two rivers at the same time, undecided?

In my stay here in the seminary, I learned to dedicate myself to the life which I had decided to commit myself, which God gives to me. Thought difficult, I always do my best to do things, not for the sake of doing them as required but for the own betterment of my life, for my future service to the people of God and to God Himself. there are many challenges that I face every day. But I continue to be dedicated and committed in this life God gave to me; I chose to live.


Truly, in the sacred scripture, Christ had said that we can not serve two masters at the same time otherwise you will hate the other and will love the one. Same us in our life, we can not live a double life. The act of living is itself called ‘focus’; giving our full attention, force, energy, and passion in our aim. And if ever we woke up one morning with the dilemma of two interests, may we learn to choose the best that fits our identity, our being human

Thursday, September 26, 2013

GOD HAS A PLAN FOR YOU

10 Thus says the LORD: Only after seventy years have elapsed for Babylon will I visit you and fulfill for you my promise to bring you back to this place.
11 For I know well the plans I have in mind for you, says the LORD, plans for your welfare, not for woe! plans to give you a future full of hope.
12 When you call me, when you go to pray to me, I will listen to you.
13 When you look for me, you will find me. Yes, when you seek me with all your heart,
14 you will find me with you, says the LORD, and I will change your lot; I will gather you together from all the nations and all the places to which I have banished you, says the LORD, and bring you back to the place from which I have exiled you.

Jeremiah 29:10-14



Once there was a woman named Teresa whose suitor Evan went to another country to work. Before he left, Evan promised Teresa that he would write her a letter every day. That was before the age of emails. And indeed, Evan was true to his promise. Every day, the postman would come to Teresa’s house to bring Evan’s letter. Finally, after one year of relentless letter writing, they were boyfriend and girlfriend to one another. Teresa and the postman.

There are instances in our life when we fall in love with the the means than with the end, when we fall in love with the wrapper than with gift, with the bridge than with the destiny. Same is true with our journey of faith. But there is a difference. We have a faithful God. Whatever he had said and promised he will do it. Whatever he says becomes. In the scripture, God expressed his enormous love for us. He had created all the wonders of this world for us to experience his great love for us. However, we had fallen in love with the means He had employed. We fell in love with the riches of the created realities, instead of falling in love with the Creator. We fell out of love from God, as we fall in love to these worldly allurements. Such is our fall. But despite this God remains to be faithful in his love for us.

Immediately after our fall, God expressed His desire to save us, to restore the grace in us. I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; He will strike at your head, while you strike at his heel (Gen 3:15). Throughout the history of our salvation, we experienced God’s faithfulness to this promise of salvation, and our disobedience to him. It is an interplay of Yes and No. God says Yes to our salvation. God said YES to Abraham, to Moses and to Jacob, but they did otherwise. Isn’t it funny to realize that the story of the Israelites in the Old Testament is our same story today? God says YES to us. We say No to his Will, and Yes to ourselves. We made our own plans. We charter our own destiny. We write our own stories. We had lived our own lives for ourselves. But indeed, many are the plans in our hearts, but it is the decision of the LORD that endures (Proverbs 19:21). Until we learn to say NO to our selves, NO to our own plans, No to our own comforts, NO to the certainties and securities of this world, it is only then we can say YES to His love. YES to His will. YES to His plan for us. It is only then that we can be faithful in Him as He is faithful to His promise to us.  It is by our constant self denial that we can be faithful to God. As a holy man once said: It is by being faithful to our NO that we can be faithful to our YES.

Today, more than ever, we face a crisis in our Church and in the Society. We face the graft and corruption in our government. We experience the prevalent moral degradation in every nooks and corners of our communities. We have become indifferent to the sufferings of the other. We have thought of ourselves more than the others. We have realize our own plans more than that of God’s. The crisis in our Church and in the Society is a crisis of faith. Thus, we have to re-evaluate and examine our Faith in God and the amount of trust we give to the things we created.

We fall in love to the created realities, to the means God provided to us that supposed to lead us to Him, that would help us to understand ourselves. We have more faith in the created realities more than in the Creator. We have trust in the creation of our hands more than in the hands of the One who created all, the hands of God.



In our desire to attain the fullness of our lives, time and again we find ourselves busy realizing our own idea and designs, laying out own blueprints of our lives. We trust and relay to our own abilities and views. And time and again we are saddened, frustrated and unsatisfied.
But how does one measure the fullness of life? It is not by the number of houses we have, amount of riches accumulated, awards received, positions held. Our life is more than these things. We are worth more than these. Only in God we can realize our real worth. Only by allowing God to work in our lives, we can achieved total satisfaction. At the end of our lives, God will not ask us how much house, cars, money in the bank we have. God will ask us how we have obeyed his will? How much we have accepted, realized and had been faithful in His plan for us?  How much we have loved Him? How much we have loved?   

Upon returning from his work overseas, Evan came to know about the relationship of Teresa with the postman. He sought Teresa’s attention and love, again. And after some times, they get married, Teresa and Evan.


In the end, despite our disobedience and falling out of love from God, His plan for us will be realized: salvation attained, satisfaction achieved. For the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable (Romans 11:29). His love never fails, His love for us endures forever (Ps 136:1-2).  

Wednesday, September 11, 2013

TOUCH MOVE, WALANG BAWIAN: The Irrevocable Call and Gift from God

In the letter to the Romans, Chapter Eleven, Paul speaks about the rejection by Israel to Jesus Christ as the Messiah, the one sent by God to liberate them. They transgress against the will of the Father by not listening and believing to the Son and his message of salvation. They commit a grievous sin of disobedience against Him. But despite their disobedience and unbelief, God remains faithful to His promise of salvation. Israel remains to be a chosen nation for God. In this, Paul remains to be hopeful that Israel, in due time, would realize their transgression against God and believe in the salvific message of Jesus Christ, the Messiah. The hardening of the heart of Israel towards Jesus Christ is just but a temporary state, neither total nor permanent.[1] It is their partial insensitivity.[2] It plays a role in the entire schema of salvation. In time this hardening will be taken away and the Jews will be reconciled with God once again, in this way all Israel will be saved.[3] For Paul, God’s gift and his call are irrevocable (Rom 11:29). Paul finds a way to turn this tragic event of unbelief of Israel as a gracious means of God to share the message of salvation brought by Christ, to the Gentiles. It is the full complement of the Gentiles.[4] Through Israel’s fall, the Gentiles attain their salvation (Roman 11: 30-32). But no heartbreaking event, in this case Israel’s rejection of Jesus Christ, can impede God in realizing his plan of salvation for all, for as Paul has said, God’s gift and his call are irrevocable (Rom 11:29).

Through this Chapter, there seem to be an emphasis on the continuation of the plan of salvation of God to Israel. Paul would insist or rather would remain hopeful on the fulfillment of the promise of God to Israel; making twist and turn looking for the right interpretation of the events surrounding the Jews and Gentiles’ reception of Jesus Christ. The Greek word for irrevocable is ametameletos. It means ‘not to be regretted, without regret, hence irrevocable, of something one does not take away. It can mean that God never changes his mind, even cannot change His mind.[5] Ametameletos gives the impression of God’s firmness in his decision; decisiveness, persistence despite of discouraging events.

No amount of human acts, such as sin, disbelief, unfaithfulness, can alter the plan of God to us. God plans to save us all.[6] Some may cooperate, while others may remain to be indifferent to the salvific act of God in our history. But this will not change the plan of God for us, for He knows us through and through. Even before He created us He knows our weaknesses, our fragility. But God does not condemn us because of our weakness. He seizes it as an opportunity for Him to be closer to us, and for us to seek Him who would realize our deepest longing in life; to be with Him our Creator.

We may be guilty of terrible sins, offense against God. Sometimes we may feel unworthy to receive Him, worse is, to be hopeless for our salvation. But Paul teaches us to remain hopeful and discerning for the hands of God working in our lives. God’s plan of salvation for us would be realized despite of our unworthiness. Paul encourages us to keep the faith in God and to His promise of salvation for God’s gift and his call are irrevocable (Rom 11:29).     





[1] William Barclay, The Daily Study Bible Series, The Letter to the Romans, revised ed. (Edinburgh: Saint Andrew Press, 1975) 152.
[2] Joseph A. Fitzmyer, SJ, “The Letter to the Romans” in The New Jerome Biblical Commentary, ed. Raymond E. Brown SS, et al (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1990) 861.
[3] Ibid.
[4] Ibid.
[5] Richard C. Blight, Exetical helps on the Epistle to the Romans, ed. John Beekman ( Mexico: Casa de Publicaciones en Cien Lenguas Maestro Moises Saenz, 1979) 281.
[6] Cf. In the Fourth Eucharistic Prayer (Canon IV) the Church addresses God in the following words: "Father, we proclaim your greatness: all your actions show your wisdom and love. You formed man in your own likeness and set him over the whole world to serve you, his creator, and to rule over all creatures. Even when in disobedience he rejected your friendship you did not abandon him to the power of death...." See: Gen 3:15, Rom 6:17, 1 Tim 2:4. 

Monday, September 9, 2013

FAITHFULNESS

On my way to my examination for lectorate, along the corridors of the church, two men asked for some food from me. They were begging for food to eat for they had not eaten anything for the day. I was poised to shrug them away as I was in haste to go San Pio Building. They looked to be the usual magagantsos (urban brigands) we entertained in our lobby. They seemed to be strong and able enough to look for a job and earn wages for their sustenance. Between a few seconds of conversation with them, I realized that I was in my religious habit. I was reminded of my religious state. I am a religious.

Jesus preached against hypocrisy. He preached for consistency of our words with our deeds, of our way of life with our vocation, our identity with our action. Confucius taught the same thing in his doctrine of rectification of names – to know and use the proper designations of things, persons, etc. Only through the consistency of our words and deeds, consistent with the Word and Deeds of Jesus for us, we can be truly Christians, in name and in way of life.


After asking the kitchen staff to give some food to the two hungry men, I proceeded to San Pio Building for my examination. As the elevator of the building opened I saw myself in a radiant white religious habit bringing books, reviewers, and all sorts of religious meme in me. I thought I had been busying myself with many things forgetting the essentials in my vocation: forgetting to believe, forgetting to love, substituting them with things of less value, ending up as a half-baked religious.

The call of Jesus, thousand years ago, to a consistent life, in words, deeds, and vocation, reverberates to this day. Heeding his call will lead us towards an authentic existence, authentic Christians, authentic religious.     

Saturday, September 7, 2013

The Corinthians and the Truth of Resurrection

1 Corinthians 15: 1-11 discusses the wavering faith of the Corinthians to the gospel Paul had preached to them. This is partly due to the unbelief of some Corinthians in the resurrection. Here, Paul attempts to persuade them to keep the gospel, which they have received for it is the cause of their salvation. Paul does such through a creedal formula, characterized by kerygmatic elements. Paul continues by proving the fact of resurrection of the dead against the unbelief of the some Corinthians. This is one among the issues that divides the church in Corinth.[1] Though the scholars give emphasis on the embedded creedal formula in this periscope, this article is limited in discussing the attempt of Paul to prove the truth of the resurrection, as this topic is vital to the succeeding discussions in the entire chapter, and in the faith in Christ of the church in Corinth.

Paul addresses the church in Corinth, with the unbelief of some of her members in the truth of the resurrection of the dead. This can be understood from the Greek point of view. As early as sixth century, the Greeks, Corinthians included, had formed a concept of afterlife. This can be read on the writings of Homer, specifically on Odyssey, wherein the Ghost of Achilles told Odysseus “I would rather serve as slave to another man, a man with no land and livelihood, than be a king over all the rotted corpses (Odyssey, 11.489–91).”[2] This describes the Hellenistic notion of the Underworld, where the human psyche proceeds after death, there to rot in eternity. There is no coming to life again in the Hellenistic worldview, in the Corinthian worldview too. The dead will never be seen in this world of the living.

With this Paul takes the task of proving the truth of resurrection by presenting events pointing to the facticity of the said event, of being there physically, historically, in this case of Christ being there physically, historically, after his death.

Seeing is the ordinary means to recognize the presence of something. In the attempt of Paul to convince the Corinthians about the truth of the resurrection of Christ, he wrote to the them about the post-resurrection events experienced and participated by the Twelve and the others disciples, lastly by Paul. The Greek text of the epistle used the Greek word ωφθε (aorist verb, passive, third person, singular) meaning “He was seen.” ωφθε appears four times throughout the pericope (1 Cor 1:11), thus bears significance to the entire argument of the facticity of the resurrection. The object of ωφθε is the risen Christ. “That he appeared to Kephas, then to the Twelve. After that, he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at once, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. After that he appeared to James, then to all the apostles. Last of all, as to one born abnormally, he appeared to me (1 Cor 15: 5-8).” There exist an emphasis on the object of ωφθε, more so on ωφθε itself, on the event that took place; act of seeing.

By ωφθε, Paul attempts to counter act against the unbelief of some Corinthians to the resurrection. By appealing to their sense of sight, sense that is important to the Hellenistic worldview, Paul hopes that they would be faithful to the gospel he preached and to shun away anything from their former way of life such as the Hellenistic view of afterlife; that there is no resurrection of the dead.


[1] Raymond F. Collins. Sacra Pagina: First Corinthians. Daniel J. Harrington, SJ. ed. (Minnesota: Liturgical Press, 1996) pp. 529-533.


[2] Death, Burial, and the Afterlife in Ancient Greece, http://www.metmuseum.org/ toah/hd/dbag/hd_

dbag.htm, accessed August 31, 2013.

Critique on the Re-Visioning of Mission in Contemporary Times

There is a trend roaming in the world today, regarding the phenomenon of doing mission. It is missio inter gentes. It is a flight away from missio ad gentes of the past, together with the motivations of salus animarum and plantatio ecclesiae. This is a response to the changes and challenges we face today in the ever globalized world, brought about by post-modernity. It is an act involving transcendence of urges to dominate and control, to transcend inherited dualisms, and transcend the anthropocentric will-to-power.



Today, more than ever, the missionaries are confronted to recognize the God they proclaim to the world, to be already present in the world and in the contextual realities to which they are proclaiming Him, long before they arrived and have encounter with these realities. Thus, to do mission today is to dialogue with these contextual realities, to listen to them for they too has God’s words, and God’s message to proclaim. This is a total deconstruction of the notion that the missionaries have the monopoly of God’s message to the world. It had became a thing of the past that the missionaries arrive in a place with the thought of treating all that do not belong to them, did not come from them, as evil, thus, must be destroyed and be replaced by what they have brought into this place. Whatever one encounters in a mission territory deserves recognition and appreciation. These contextual realities too speak about God and His message, for God spoke too to the people of these realities. God is present too in these realities.

Today’s mission is dialogue and in dialogue. We cannot anymore do mission in a passion similar of that of the past. Development in Catholic theology and missiology, prove such attempt to relive the past to be an exercise in futility today. We recognize God and his message in other religions, para-religions, cultures and traditions. We go to place with the intent of meeting people, learning from them about God, and celebrating God’s given blessings with them.

Edgar Javier’s exposition of the re-visioning of mission in contemporary time is worthy of praise. However, I would like to assess the existential underpinnings that seem to be wanting in Javier’s presentation of mission as a dialogue.

Dialogue is two way process between the ‘I’ and the ‘other,’ as the very etymology of the word suggests. It is not all above the I (messenger) teaching the other (receiver), alone. Dialogue also takes place vice versa. The I learns also from the other, making the other a messenger and the I a receiver of a message from the other. In this way, a missionary goes to place, not only with the intention of learning and listening from the other. The missionary too ought to communicate to others the message he carries with him; the message of salvation that Christ had won for the human race. This may seem a thing of the past, but it is not. The latter, alone, is, but with the former, the two forms a new way of doing mission. That is the novelty of the present paradigm. Mission is teaching the others and listening to them in their own contextual realities.


Missionaries must not be drifting through the pad of listening and letting the others express their particularity and uniqueness, alone. After listening and understanding the others, they ought to speak and bring forth what they have brought with them; the Gospel of Christ. With their feet firmly standing on a solid ground of faith in Christ, knowledge of who they are and the very reason why they are there, the missionaries may be able to dialogue and bear witness in the post-modern world.                  

The Catechetical Significance of the Katolisismo Catechetical Series produced by the Catechetical Foundation of the Archdiocese of Manila (CFAM) in the Light of the National Catechetical Directory of the Philippines (NCDP)


The production of catechetical series in various media, either in print, video, audio, or in multimedia through the internet, had increase recently, more particularly in the latter. This is due to the availability of wide range and cheap means of media productions. Information dissemination, for example, through social media such as in facebook, twitter, instagram, etc. had become a common phenomenon today. Time and again, as one surfs the walls of his FB account, he would see picture text explaining doctrines and dogmas of the Catholic faith. Catechetical materials proliferate in the internet today. In fact, even catechetical apps are available, to receive regular updates on faith and the Church. Thus, there is the commencement of information, especially catechetical data, explosion in today’s world more particularly in the cyber space.



With the advent of the usage of internet as one of the means to catechize, one may question the validity and effectiveness of the materials uploaded for catechetical use. Are they effective and affective enough to communicate the faith to their consumers? With this context at hand, let us look on the case of the Katolisismo Catechetical Series produced by the Catechetical Foundation of the Archdiocese of Manila (CFAM). To guide us in our inquiry to the effectiveness and affectivity of these materials, we will use the National Catechetical Directory of the Philippines (NCDP) as our lens in looking at these materials, particularly the emphasis it gives on the three depositories of faith: Sacred Scriptures, Tradition and Magisterium, and the sensitivity on the various Filipino contexts. 

The Tanging kay Jesukristo Catechetical Series produced by the Catechetical Foundation of the Archdiocese of Manila (CFAM)

As Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI opened the year of faith during the liturgical year 2012-2013, the Catechetical Foundation of the Archdiocese of Manila (CFAM) had produced and released a catechetical series entitled Katolisismo. These series are posted on the internet through the official website of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) coordinating committee for the celebration of the Year of Faith in the country (www.yearoffaith.ph). These are also posted on the official website of the CFAM (www.cfamphil.org). Furthermore, these catechetical materials are promoted by linking them with various social media sites e.g. FB, Twitter, Blogspots etc.        

CFAM’s Katolisismo series discusses the Seven Sacraments in the Catholic Church. It is primarily presented in a picture text layout, downloadable in PDF file format. It is divided into eight separate documents, which includes general introductions to the sacraments and discussions on the seven sacraments per se. CFAM uses Filipino as the language of instruction. Thus it is presupposed that the desired consumers of the material are Filipinos. Being a catechetical material produced in the Year of Faith, the series aims to poster and enrich the Christian faith. This end is realized through discussions and reflections on the realities of the sacraments in the life of the Filipino. It has, as its primary sources, the Sacred Scripture, Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC), and Catechism for the Filipino Catholics (CFC).

Each document is divided into three sub-topics, namely, Ang Kalagayan ng mga Pinoy, Ang Turo ng Simbahan, and Ang Hamon sa mga Pinoy. These sub-topics can be roughly translated as Filipino Context, Catholic Doctrines, and the Challenge to the Filipinos.

The Ang Kalagayan ng mga Pinoy presents the situation and background where the topic that is to be discussed is set today. It is the introduction part of the entire document. This part posts frequently asked questions regarding the topics, misconceptions, nuances between what the Church teaches and what the people believes. For example on the introduction on the General Introduction on the Sacraments, CFAM begins its discussion by posting the following realities surrounding the sacraments:

May mga nagrereklamo:
·         Maliit pa ako nang ako’y binyagan…hindi ko alam ang kahulugan nito.
·         Nakapagkumpisal ako nang hindi ko ganap na nalalaman kung ano ang kasalanan.
·         Tumanggap ako ng komunyon nang hindi nauunawaan kung paaanong si Jesus ay naroon.
Ikaw may mga raklamo ka rin ba? Bakit may mga Sakramento kung hindi naman natin ganap na nauuunawaan ang mga ito? Sagutin natin ang tanong na ito sa tulong ng Salita ng Diyos at turo ng Simbahan.[1]

The discussions and instructions begin in very concrete realities from which the readers can relate. In this manner, the topic is put to the conscious of the readers by tickle their minds with the things that truly concern them, on which they can say something about, and which later they can own. 

Ang Turo ng Simbahan follows the presentation of the concrete realities facing the particular sacrament. It uses the Sacred Scriptures and Church Doctrines to answer the questions posted on the previous part. It expounds the discussion of on a sacrament through direct quotations from the Sacred Scriptures. These Scriptural passages correspond to the biblical foundations and basis of the Sacraments. This inclusion of biblical passages as foundation and basis of the sacraments can be viewed as a response of the local Church to the growing number of evangelicals who anchor their preaching on the Bible, and accuse the Catholic Church, and her teachings and doctrines as something that have no biblical basis. Through the eight separate documents, CFAM gives prominence and importance on the Word of God as the basis of the Catechism. The purpose and importance of the sacraments are even derived from and based on the Sacred Scriptures. On the sacrament of Baptism, for example, the passages are used to explain the necessity of baptism.

Ang Binyag ay kailangan sa kaligtasan. Sinabi ni Jesus sa Kanyang mga Apostoles bago Siya umakyat sa Ama ( cf Mateo 28:19) “Humayo kayo at gawin ninyong alagad Ko ang lahat ng bansa. Binyagan ninyo sila sa ngalan ng Ama at ng Anak at ng Espiritu Santo.” Sinabi pa Niya : “Maliban na ang tao ay ipanganak sa tubig at sa Espiritu, hindi siya paghaharian ng Diyos.” (Juan 3: 5) Sa Ebanghelyo naman ni San Markos, sinasabi: “Ang sumasampalataya at mabinyagan ay maliligtas; ngunit ang hindi sumampalataya ay parurusahan.” (16:16)[2]  

This portion of the catechetical materials also point out the dogmatic and doctrinal teaching of the Church vis-a-vis the Sacred Tradition surrounding the concerned teaching. On the sacrament of the confirmation, for example, CFAM attempts to gives the etymology of the word ‘confirmation’ to explain further the sacrament itself:

Tinatawag ang Sakramentong ito na Krismasion, pagpapahid ng may krisma o mayroon na siyang “Krisma”. Tinatawag din itongn “confirmation” nangangahulugan ng confirmasyon o pagpapatibay ng Binyag. Ang Kumpil ay ang Sakramento na nagbibigay ng mga biyaya ng Espiritu Santo upang tayo ay maging ganap na Kristiyano at saksi ni Kristo sa salita at gawa, hanggang sa kamatayan. Pinatitibay nito at pinatatatag ang mga biyayang tinanggap sa Binyag.[3] 

Through the use of the Sacred Scripture and Sacred Tradition, CFAM is able to illustrate the solid foundation on which the Sacraments in the Catholic Church stand. That indeed the Sacraments and the other doctrines and beliefs of the Church are not creates by persons throughout the ages. Indeed, the faith given to us is a faith received and written by persons inspired by the Holy Spirit and hand-over from one generation to other, either in written or unwritten manner, either through the Scriptures or Tradition.

The Hamon sa mga Pinoy serves as the concluding part of the catechetical material. It puts forward challenges that Filipino Catholics need to address in their local communities or in their own lives. It has a reflective and meditative tone, so much so that the readers are encouraged to be in silent for a moment and ask themselves the questions and challenges provided. On the document on the sacrament of matrimony, CFAM emphasizes the relevant and immediate issues involved:

Ang unang hamon sa bawat mag-asawang Pinoy ay ang pagpaplano ng pamilya. Ang ikalawang hamon ay ang kabanalan ng kasal. Kung ikaw ay isang dalaga o binata , handa ka na bang magpakasal? Paano mo ito pinaghahandaan? Kung ikaw ay kasal na sa sibil, kailan mo binabalak na magpakasal sa Simbahan ? Kung ikaw ay kasal sa Simbahan, paano mo aalagaan ang iyong buhay may asawa ? Ipagdasal natin ang lahat ng may asawa lalo na yong mga bagong kasal.[4]  

In the organization of the materials for each document, CFAM follows the order of Morals-Doctrine-Worship, instead of the traditionally and usual order of Doctrine-Morals-Worship. It is similar with that of the CFC. It takes into consideration the reality in the Philippine context of the separation of moral life from the life in faith and in the Church. The Doctrinal part is sandwiched between morals and worship to give emphasis on the integral character it possesses. That indeed it can be incorporated in the very life the faithful lives. This thrust is further promoted by the concrete and experiential data gathered and presented in the materials such as those mentioned as an example above. 

The Catechetical Significance

The Katolisismo Catechetical Series produced by CFAM has a great catechetical significance for Filipino Catholics in the Year of Faith. Its discussions on the sacraments are divided mainly into three sub-divisions namely Ang Kalagayan ng mga Pinoy, Ang Turo ng Simbahan, and Ang Hamon sa mga Pinoy. These subdivisions facilitate to a more effective and affective approach on the sacraments for the Filipino Catholics in need of catechesis on the said topics. Each subdivision serves as avenue for CFAM to communicate the faith in a manner close to the hearts of the Filipino Catholics. It allows the CFAM to include experiences that affects and concerns the readers in their day to day lives. The manner of arrangement and presentation of the data gathered also contributes to its efficiency in delivering the message of faith and touching the lives of the Filipinos. It begins with the concrete and experiential leading to a more abstract and guiding principles provided by the Church, in this case the truths about the sacraments. These abstract principles can be applied on concrete experiences and not merely inventions of Churchmen. This can be proven through the concluding part of the materials, wherein the readers are challenged by reflective and meditative questions to apply the truths of faith in their lives.

Often the Church is accused of being detached from the realities of the lives of the faithful. Others would say the Church something that floats in the air and finds difficulty touching down the ground. But through the critical arrangement used by CFAM in presenting the Sacraments, this can be disproved. What the Church says on faith and morals are true in the ancient times and all the more today. The beliefs and the teachings the Church preaches remain to be relevant.

The use of the three depositories of faith, namely the Sacred Scripture, Sacred Tradition and the Magisterium proved to be of great help in boosting the credibility and truthfulness of our beliefs on the sacraments as means instituted by Christ Himself to dispense grace. This can be viewed in an apologetic point of view. As mentioned above, the growth of evangelical communities and biblical fundamentalists necessitates us to bring forth the richness of our beliefs in terms of biblical foundations and sustenance.  

Conclusion

The Katolisismo Catechetical Series produced by the CFAM is a great help for us all, catechists, catechumens, preachers, religious and clerics. It is an effective tool in preaching and discussing the truths about the sacraments. It is an affective to the Filipino Catholics as it touches their lives through the concrete experiences and applications it provides. In the era of information explosion, especially catechetical information, the CFAM’s Katolisimo Catechetical Series proved to be one among those catechetical materials that are effective in preaching the Word of God, and touching the lives of the Filipino Catholics and the likes.  



[1]Ang Pitong Sakramento ng Iglesya Katolika” in Katolisismo (Manila: CFAM, 2012), 2.
[2]Ang Sakramento ng Binyag – Bagong Buhay kay Kristo,” in Katolisismo (Manila: CFAM, 2012), 3. 
[3] “Ang Sakramento ng Kumpil – Bagong Buhay kay Kristo,” in Katolisismo (Manila: CFAM, 2012), 3.
[4] “Ang bokasyon kay Kristo: Ang Sakramento ng Kasal,” in Katolisismo (Manila: CFAM, 2012), 6.  

A Critique on Javier’s “The Missionary amidst Different Culture and Religious Traditions”

Edgar Javier presents in a coherent manner the contemporary missiology, particularly the missionary’s present status in the ever changing world. He begins his discussion by elaborating the concept of globalization, the phenomenon it creates and the impact it has to the world. The explanation on the building blocks of globalization proved to be helpful to the readers in understanding the effects this phenomenon simulated in an unprecedented manner. With the flow of science and technology, and availability of tools for communication to almost everyone, indeed the globe becomes one. It allows everyone to be connected and interconnected to each other. Thus, science and technology paved the way for the advent of globalization. Together with this is the enormous capacity and power entrusted on the hands of man either to recreate, preserve, or destroy the Earth with all its riches.

By positing three challenges that should direct reflection on missiological prospects for the twenty first century, Javier proceeds to discuss missiology in the context of post modernity seating side by side with globalization. Concrete situations were presented so as to elucidate the readers to where and how missionaries should live. Javier’s employment of Claude Geffre’s four acts in which the writing of the possibilities and promises of history can be possible, established a solid foundation for the establishment of a more humane human society, where respect for one’s self, for other and to the Earth exist. With that, Javier continues his discussion with the re-imaging of the missionary in the new world. It presents the missionaries in the Asian context, being the locus and milieu of mission inter gentes. It is where they are expected to be bridge-builders towards the other religious and culture. They ought to be healers of people memory, home builders and man of silence.


Javier’s discussion could have been better if a considerable part of the article was dedicated to the theology of harmony instead of the economic and philosophical underpinnings of the present missiology. The harmonization between the Catholic Christian teachings, which is primarily western in orientation, with the Eastern and other pertinent cultures can elucidate further the challenges confronting the contemporary mission of the Church. Theological and historical inputs can be of great help in this aspect of missiology. By understanding first the history of the Asia in connection with the past missionaries from the west, the way the West presented themselves and their cultures to the East, we can best charter the future of mission in Asia, which is comprise of various culture and traditions. 

THE OTHER SIDE OF HEAVEN

The film ‘The Other Side of Heaven’ shows the story of John, a Mormon missionary who when to the Kingdom of Tongan, in the Pacific, to learn the language and built the kingdom. As a missionary, John, who was fondly called Kollipoki by the locals, did several actions worthy of examining. These actions will be classified in three categories in this review; Acts he did that I will do, Acts he did that I will not do, and Acts he did not do that I will do.

Mens sana in coprpore sano. Kollipoki did care for the social aspect of the Catholics in Tongan. One instance in the movie that showed this care is the scene with Tomasi. Kollipoki cared for Tomasi, not just for his spiritual well being but also his bodily health. Kollipoki let him had a haircut, took a bath, wore clean clothes and avoided drinking alcohol, then fed him with word of God. This tells us that spiritual well being involves the wellness of the body too. After all how can one preach to persons incapable of receiving the message of Christ because of physical and social impediments? 

Waiting for the mails. Kollipoki often waited for the mails to arrive in the island, mails from his girlfriend whom he had left behind in the mainland. By waiting, Kollipoki failed to be in proper disposition to do mission, sometimes. His heart was divided between love for the people of Tongan and his love for his GF. How could his mission been better, should Kollipoki gave his full attention to the people, after all doing mission is about giving one’s attention to the people; being there, listening, counseling, preaching, caring, etc. It is a ministry of presence.


Dialogue with the other religious leader. Together with Kollipoki in the island of  Tongan is another religious leader of different sect. They barely spoke with one another. They had several encounter, but such were characterized by hostility and  antagonism with one another. They did talk with one another, but it was at the religious leader’s dying hours. They did so, I believe, out of necessity and dictates of conscience, but to understand one another’s differences, I do not think so. How could their missionary works in Tongan, in building the Kingdom of God in that corner of the world been better, should they had strove to understand one another. It could have deliver the message of unity to the people of Tongan, to work together and live peaceful in the midst of differences and uniqueness of one another.